Free Consultation | Call 24/7

Mesothelioma Legal Articles

Group of people attending burial
For purposes of this article, the mesothelioma victim in this case will be referred to as D.B. In a landmark decision, a Florida Jury awarded over $9 million to the widow of D.B., an employee benefits advisor who was diagnosed and later succumbed to malignant mesothelioma. While D.B. never actually worked directly with asbestos, he alleged exposure through frequent visits to Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation facilities, which were laden with asbestos, played a significant role in his mesothelioma diagnosis. Following his passing, his wife, Rosa Maria, carried forward the wrongful death lawsuit.
A close up of a watch face with roman numerals
The mesothelioma latency period refers to the time between initial exposure to asbestos and a diagnosis. It is primarily a ā€œsilentā€ one because it can take 10-50 years before one is diagnosed with mesothelioma. The latency period can be shorter or longer than the 10-50-year range depending on factors such as one’s gender, age, time of initial exposure to asbestos, and individual health conditions. The Silent Latency Period of Mesothelioma As earlier mentioned, it can take 10-50 years between the initial asbestos exposure and a mesothelioma diagnosis.
Evidence for Your Mesothelioma Lawsuit
If you have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, you have the right to file a mesothelioma lawsuit against parties responsible for your asbestos exposure. Mesothelioma lawsuits require compelling evidence of asbestos exposure to hold negligent parties accountable. Unfortunately, gathering such evidence can be challenging due to the disease’s long latency period. Companies responsible for asbestos exposure may have shut down, witnesses might struggle to recall details, and you may have unknowingly faced multiple asbestos exposures. Despite all this, you can build a solid case with the proper evidence.
Architectural photography of trial court interior view
For purposes of this article, the claimants in this case will be referred to as S.S and B.S. In a recent court decision, a Rhode Island judge ruled in favor of two plaintiffs, S.S. and B.S., a couple pursuing justice against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) in a mesothelioma lawsuit. S.S., a mesothelioma patient, and B.S., her husband, filed the lawsuit against more than 40 defendants, including two subsidiaries of Johnson & Johnson, who they blame for negligently exposing her to asbestos through their talc products.
Share Blogs

Contact Us

Get the Help You Deserve

To schedule your initial consultation, please fill out the form or call 888.506.1131

  • Free Consultation
  • Will Travel to You
  • No Fees Unless You Win

"*" indicates required fields

Full Name*
MM slash DD slash YYYY
*Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in this form. This form sends information by non-encrypted e-mail which is not secure.

Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Contact Us

Get the Help You Deserve

To schedule your initial consultation, please fill out the form or call 888.506.1131

  • Free Consultation
  • Will Travel to You
  • No Fees Unless You Win

"*" indicates required fields

Full Name*
MM slash DD slash YYYY
*Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in this form. This form sends information by non-encrypted e-mail which is not secure.

Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Free Consultation | Call 24/7

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.